A Lutheran Historian Looks at Sola Scritpura
Is the Bible Really all you Need to Determine Christian Doctrine?
That is the central question surrounding much of the Protestant Reformation. Here is what one respected, contemporary, Lutheran historian and theologian has to say about it. It is the Catholic position, clear and simple. Why are not more Lutherans and other Protestants as honest and truthful as this? (Stan Williams)
Perhaps the Reformers were somewhat
naive in the way they isolated the apostolic witness, in their belief that they
could determine this by simple reference to the Scriptures. They did not always realize how bound
they were by their own past, their outlook on life, their schooling in philosophy,
their personal predilections. They were somewhat unrealistic about the ease
with which one could slice through the complications of centuries to an
original witness. "The Reformation principle of Sola Scriptura (Scripture
alone) is fraught with the difficulty that the Scriptura has never been sola!"
(1) We can still observe this: "Give a basic New Testament passage to an
Orthodox, a Lutheran, a Calvinist, an Anglican, and a Congregationalist to
interpret and the discrepancies in their interpretations will correlate much
too closely with the various historically conditioned traditions in which they
stand to justify any claim that they did no more than reproduce the original
meaning." (2) History, liturgy, tradition, psychic make-up, the
experiences of life color the interpretation of Scriptura.
--Martin E. Marty, pp 164-165
Quoted from: A Short History of Christianity (Second Edition) by Martin E. Marty a well-respected Lutheran historian, theologian, author, Senior Editor of The Christian Century, and Distinguished Service Professor of the History of Modern Christianity at the Divinity School of the University of Chicago.
Marty quotes:
(1) Jaroslav Pelikan in More About Luther. Luther College Press, 1958, p. 50.
(2) Albert C. Outler in The Christian Tradition and the Unity We Seek. Oxford University Press, 1957, p. 36.